9. term
Parties & Seimas Factions
| # | Party | Faction | Deputies | Inactivity % | Attendance % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TS-LKDF Homeland Union |
TS-LKDF | 54 |
48.2%
|
100.0%
|
| 2 | LVŽSF LVŽSF |
LVŽSF | 21 |
62.2%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | DFVL | 17 |
59.2%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 4 | LSDPF Social Democrats |
LSDPF | 13 |
58.7%
|
100.0%
|
| 5 | LSF | 12 |
50.7%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 6 | LF LF |
LF | 12 |
49.7%
|
100.0%
|
| 7 | DPF DPF |
DPF | 12 |
60.3%
|
100.0%
|
| 8 | MSNG | 8 |
65.7%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 9 | LRF LRF |
LRF | 3 |
66.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 10 | LRPF LRPF |
LRPF | 1 |
66.3%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.