8. term
Parties & Seimas Factions
| # | Party | Faction | Deputies | Inactivity % | Attendance % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LVŽSF LVŽSF |
LVŽSF | 57 |
54.3%
|
100.0%
|
| 2 | TS-LKDF Homeland Union |
TS-LKDF | 38 |
67.9%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | LSF | 12 |
68.7%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 4 | LSDDF LSDDF |
LSDDF | 11 |
67.5%
|
100.0%
|
| 5 | LSDPF Social Democrats |
LSDPF | 11 |
69.7%
|
99.9%
|
| 6 | MSNG | 9 |
68.6%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 7 | LLRA-KŠSF LLRA-KŠSF |
LLRA-KŠSF | 8 |
65.6%
|
100.0%
|
| 8 | TTF TTF |
TTF | 7 |
64.3%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.