6. term
Parties & Seimas Factions
| # | Party | Faction | Deputies | Inactivity % | Attendance % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TS-LKDF Homeland Union |
TS-LKDF | 48 |
48.8%
|
100.0%
|
| 2 | LSDPF Social Democrats |
LSDPF | 28 |
63.2%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | TTF TTF |
TTF | 19 |
62.8%
|
100.0%
|
| 4 | DPF DPF |
DPF | 12 |
64.5%
|
100.0%
|
| 5 | LSF | 12 |
65.5%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 6 | KPF KPF |
KPF | 9 |
65.3%
|
100.0%
|
| 7 | LCSF LCSF |
LCSF | 9 |
67.6%
|
100.0%
|
| 8 | MSNG | 8 |
60.1%
|
100.0%
|
|
| 9 | TPPF TPPF |
TPPF | 7 |
65.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.