Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (5190 − 1380) / 5190 = 73.4%
Registered 5190 · Absent 0
· Votes available 5190
For: 1180 · Against: 200 ·
Abstain: 222 · Did not vote: 3588 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (13243 − 5151) / 13243 = 61.1%
Registered 13243 · Absent 0
· Votes available 13243
For: 4787 · Against: 364 ·
Abstain: 1181 · Did not vote: 6911 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (14710 − 4859) / 14710 = 67.0%
Registered 14710 · Absent 0
· Votes available 14710
For: 4612 · Against: 247 ·
Abstain: 844 · Did not vote: 9007 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (9622 − 4622) / 9622 = 52.0%
Registered 9622 · Absent 0
· Votes available 9622
For: 4218 · Against: 404 ·
Abstain: 1019 · Did not vote: 3981 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Česlav Olševski 99% agreement
- Jaroslav Narkevič 99% agreement
- Aušrinė Norkienė 99% agreement
- Eimantas Kirkutis 97% agreement
- Ligita Girskienė 96% agreement
- Bronis Ropė 96% agreement
- Vilija Targamadzė 96% agreement
- Rimas Jonas Jankūnas 95% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen 65% agreement
- Dalia Asanavičiūtė-Gružauskienė 66% agreement
- Žygimantas Pavilionis 66% agreement
- Agnė Bilotaitė 66% agreement
- Laurynas Kasčiūnas 67% agreement
- Ingrida Šimonytė 68% agreement
- Lukas Savickas 68% agreement
- Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė 68% agreement