Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (12316 − 6690) / 12316 = 45.7%
Registered 12316 · Absent 0
· Votes available 12316
For: 6083 · Against: 607 ·
Abstain: 1075 · Did not vote: 4551 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (14710 − 4840) / 14710 = 67.1%
Registered 14710 · Absent 0
· Votes available 14710
For: 4391 · Against: 449 ·
Abstain: 977 · Did not vote: 8893 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (9622 − 3818) / 9622 = 60.3%
Registered 9622 · Absent 0
· Votes available 9622
For: 3474 · Against: 344 ·
Abstain: 719 · Did not vote: 5085 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (11498 − 5764) / 11498 = 49.9%
Registered 11498 · Absent 0
· Votes available 11498
For: 5325 · Against: 439 ·
Abstain: 1601 · Did not vote: 4133 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Stasys Šedbaras 99% agreement
- Vytautas Juozapaitis 99% agreement
- Arvydas Pocius 99% agreement
- Sergejus Jovaiša 99% agreement
- Irena Haase 99% agreement
- Algis Strelčiūnas 99% agreement
- Kristijonas Bartoševičius 99% agreement
- Justinas Urbanavičius 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Valius Ąžuolas 50% agreement
- Kęstutis Glaveckas 72% agreement
- Asta Kubilienė 74% agreement
- Mindaugas Puidokas 74% agreement
- Petras Gražulis 74% agreement
- Arvydas Nekrošius 74% agreement
- Dainius Gaižauskas 75% agreement
- Dainius Kepenis 75% agreement