Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (5190 − 1563) / 5190 = 69.9%
Registered 5190 · Absent 0
· Votes available 5190
For: 1393 · Against: 170 ·
Abstain: 237 · Did not vote: 3390 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (14710 − 3763) / 14710 = 74.4%
Registered 14710 · Absent 0
· Votes available 14710
For: 3563 · Against: 200 ·
Abstain: 773 · Did not vote: 10174 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (9622 − 3482) / 9622 = 63.8%
Registered 9622 · Absent 0
· Votes available 9622
For: 3137 · Against: 345 ·
Abstain: 741 · Did not vote: 5399 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (11498 − 3701) / 11498 = 67.8%
Registered 11498 · Absent 0
· Votes available 11498
For: 3080 · Against: 621 ·
Abstain: 1319 · Did not vote: 6478 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Česlav Olševski 99% agreement
- Rita Tamašunienė 99% agreement
- Aušrinė Norkienė 98% agreement
- Eimantas Kirkutis 98% agreement
- Vilija Targamadzė 96% agreement
- Bronis Ropė 96% agreement
- Ligita Girskienė 96% agreement
- Aidas Gedvilas 95% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Dalia Asanavičiūtė-Gružauskienė 66% agreement
- Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen 67% agreement
- Ingrida Šimonytė 68% agreement
- Jurgita Sejonienė 69% agreement
- Dainius Kreivys 70% agreement
- Emanuelis Zingeris 70% agreement
- Žygimantas Pavilionis 70% agreement
- Paulė Kuzmickienė 70% agreement