Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (13243 − 7665) / 13243 = 42.1%
Registered 13243 · Absent 0
· Votes available 13243
For: 6834 · Against: 831 ·
Abstain: 938 · Did not vote: 4640 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (14710 − 7512) / 14710 = 48.9%
Registered 14710 · Absent 0
· Votes available 14710
For: 6705 · Against: 807 ·
Abstain: 1475 · Did not vote: 5723 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (11498 − 7099) / 11498 = 38.3%
Registered 11498 · Absent 0
· Votes available 11498
For: 6135 · Against: 964 ·
Abstain: 1256 · Did not vote: 3143 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3165 − 1516) / 3165 = 52.1%
Registered 3165 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3165
For: 1305 · Against: 211 ·
Abstain: 241 · Did not vote: 1408 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Jurgis Razma 99% agreement
- Vytautas Juozapaitis 98% agreement
- Stasys Šedbaras 98% agreement
- Paulius Saudargas 98% agreement
- Arvydas Anušauskas 98% agreement
- Kristijonas Bartoševičius 98% agreement
- Irena Haase 98% agreement
- Andrius Kupčinskas 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Valius Ąžuolas 49% agreement
- Asta Kubilienė 70% agreement
- Petras Gražulis 71% agreement
- Kęstutis Glaveckas 71% agreement
- Arvydas Nekrošius 71% agreement
- Mindaugas Puidokas 73% agreement
- Dainius Gaižauskas 73% agreement
- Dainius Kepenis 74% agreement