Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (5190 − 2307) / 5190 = 55.5%
Registered 5190 · Absent 0
· Votes available 5190
For: 1793 · Against: 514 ·
Abstain: 76 · Did not vote: 2807 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (9622 − 2607) / 9622 = 72.9%
Registered 9622 · Absent 0
· Votes available 9622
For: 2310 · Against: 297 ·
Abstain: 526 · Did not vote: 6489 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (11498 − 3103) / 11498 = 73.0%
Registered 11498 · Absent 0
· Votes available 11498
For: 2247 · Against: 856 ·
Abstain: 776 · Did not vote: 7619 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3165 − 1035) / 3165 = 67.3%
Registered 3165 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3165
For: 755 · Against: 280 ·
Abstain: 115 · Did not vote: 2015 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Inga Ruginienė 99% agreement
- Jurgita Šukevičienė 99% agreement
- Robertas Kaunas 98% agreement
- Julius Sabatauskas 98% agreement
- Raminta Popovienė 98% agreement
- Rimantas Sinkevičius 98% agreement
- Laurynas Šedvydis 98% agreement
- Indrė Kižienė 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen 53% agreement
- Kazys Starkevičius 58% agreement
- Žygimantas Pavilionis 58% agreement
- Simonas Kairys 58% agreement
- Laurynas Kasčiūnas 59% agreement
- Viktoras Pranckietis 59% agreement
- Dainius Kreivys 60% agreement
- Simonas Gentvilas 61% agreement