Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (13243 − 5416) / 13243 = 59.1%
Registered 13243 · Absent 0
· Votes available 13243
For: 5149 · Against: 267 ·
Abstain: 994 · Did not vote: 6833 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (5924 − 1949) / 5924 = 67.1%
Registered 5924 · Absent 0
· Votes available 5924
For: 1832 · Against: 117 ·
Abstain: 527 · Did not vote: 3448 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (9622 − 3743) / 9622 = 61.1%
Registered 9622 · Absent 0
· Votes available 9622
For: 3458 · Against: 285 ·
Abstain: 970 · Did not vote: 4909 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (11498 − 4672) / 11498 = 59.4%
Registered 11498 · Absent 0
· Votes available 11498
For: 3820 · Against: 852 ·
Abstain: 1608 · Did not vote: 5218 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Antanas Guoga 99% agreement
- Vytautas. Gapšys 99% agreement
- Viktoras Fiodorovas 99% agreement
- Valentinas Bukauskas 98% agreement
- Vaida Giraitytė-Juškevičienė 98% agreement
- Vigilijus Jukna 97% agreement
- Lukas Savickas 97% agreement
- Rima Baškienė 97% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Linas Slušnys 77% agreement
- Matas Maldeikis 78% agreement
- Gabrielius Landsbergis 78% agreement
- Andrius Navickas 78% agreement
- Kęstutis Masiulis 79% agreement
- Andrius Vyšniauskas 79% agreement
- Liuda Pociūnienė 79% agreement
- Jurgita Šiugždinienė 80% agreement